This is the third post in which Patrick Mayfield and I have began to publish our interim findings on this research over our two blogs. For the last post see: The First Emergent Pattern: Self-Awareness
_________________________________________________________
So, where is the pro-activity that Patrick discussed in his blog being deployed?

The second major finding that is emerging from our Mental Crib Sheet research is that alpha-trait managers have a distinct bias towards developing and maintaining relationships. We are seeing a correlation between the pro-active time that is being built into the working week of our managers and the time spent in managing relationships.
The self-aware, pro-active manager seems to believe that relationships are central to success. They are thinking about their mental landscape, and on that landscape they see the vital importance of stakeholders.
This bias towards relationships is seen in the amount of time that is dedicated to communicating with stakeholders. Alpha-trait managers are committing between 60% - 85% of their time to communication. We know that's what the books tell us we should do - but they are doing it!
They are not just 'ticking boxes'. One respondent who, as a result of the study, recognised that they had not proactively developed relationships described their approach to managing in this way:
"I've just done it in a sort of auto-pilot mode...".
The pro-active managers are thinking about their relationships in a real and active way.
Another point is also emerging here. we are seeing managers who are not just using the formal line structures of their projects and programmes, but instead are looking to understand the political landscape, use the informal structures and develop their extended team. We are calling this the use of the tribal network.
Research from Harvard has indicated that personal performance is actually predicated on being part of a team. Individuals that were performing at a high level (stars) experienced a drop in that performance on joining a new team.
This leads to questions about whether we really understand the role of the manager in extended teams, and again whether we are focusing in the wrong areas.
We can measure the maturity of our organisation; we have the means to carry out health-checks on our projects, programme and portfolio; we give a lot of attention to the individual practitioner's performance. All these are valid areas of focus. But are we missing a vital ingredient, are we forgetting the role of the extended team, the tribal network? It seems our alpha-trait managers are not.
For the next part of our findings - the third emergent pattern - see Patrick's blog at http://pearcemayfield.typepad.com/patrick_mayfield/